Is it supported?
Check factual claims, source identity, live state, and whether the evidence still matches the conclusion.
Taste is not a reason to skip measurement. It is the practiced ability to detect when an output is wrong for the audience, brand, product, or moment even when it is technically valid. Shoreline’s human-review loop makes that judgment inspectable rather than mystical.
The reviewer compares the output with the goal and source evidence, records the rejection reason, corrects the artifact, and converts repeated defects into a reusable rubric or automated test.
Check factual claims, source identity, live state, and whether the evidence still matches the conclusion.
Technical correctness is not enough. Review voice, context, timing, and the recipient’s actual need.
Look for generic language, poor hierarchy, weak framing, abrupt edits, and details that make the work feel unfinished.
External publishing, relationship judgment, sensitive data, money, and irreversible changes require explicit control.